This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
- To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>, msnyder at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 18:23:18 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <200204240345.g3O3j6615086@duracef.shout.net> <20020424000631.A12659@nevyn.them.org>
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:45:06PM -0500, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> > Michael Snyder writes:
> > > I think the custom is to mark the second type as "[RFA]".
> >
> > Okay, I'll try that. It feels a little funny because I'm not actually
> > asking for approval, I'm asking for a veto (if any). That is, if no
> > response comes in, then I commit such a patch.
>
> In that case, I recommend RFC... but basically, if you're just posting
> to see if anyone objects, I'd use PATCH: foo and "I'll commit this in a
> few days unless someone minds".
>
I guess Michael Snyder meant RFC. Michael Chastain does not need
approval for the gdb.c++ tests so RFA would be kind of funny.
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9