This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at cygnus dot com>
- To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec at shout dot net>
- Cc: msnyder at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2002 13:32:23 -0400
- Subject: Re: [patch] fix pr reference syntax in gdb.c++/method.exp
- References: <200204231921.g3NJLtG25527@duracef.shout.net>
> Hmmm. Sometimes, like this time, I post patches to testsuite/gdb.c++
> that I am committing immediately. And sometimes, I post patches for
> testsuite/gdb.c++ and give people a day or two to comment before I commit.
> Right now I am marking both of these as "[patch]".
>
> Michael Snyder writes:
>
>> If you want to avoid ambiguity, you could say "committed"
>> in your original "PATCH" message.
>
>
> I will do that, unless Andrew has something to say (I thought he
> liked to see explicit "committed" messages to help him mananage
> his inbox).
I think I'll stop using just [patch] as, yes it is pretty meaningless.
[commit]?
enjoy,
Andrew