This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC] document Cygwin native specific commands


> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 11:37:35 -0500
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> 
> Hmm.  Given a dump of all of GDB's commands, should there be a kindex 
> for each?

Yes, each command described in the manual should be indexed.  That
way, all users need to type to find the documentation of any given
command CMD is "i CMD <RET>", once they are in an Info reader.

The issue of undocumented commands came up several times in the past,
with Stan reminding us, time and again, a threat to remove any
undocumented commands from the code ;-)

> What about the reverse?

I don't understand the question, sorry.

> I think we might have just stumbled across something that is feasible 
> for the ARI to check.

A good idea, IMHO.  Perhaps it could also comment out any command
that doesn't have documentation ;-)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]