This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [rfa/cli] s/NO_FUNCTION/NULL/


> On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> 
>> In C, NULL is typically ``(void*)0''.  What ever it is, it must be 
>> compatible with both data and code pointers.
>> 
>> I think this makes using NULL more robust than NO_FUNCTION?
> 
> 
> NULL _should_ be more robust than NO_FUNCTION, but you can never know
> what GCC will invent next ;-)
> 
> I guess we can postpone this, and use NULL, until we see some
> warnings.  With any luck, that will never happen.


Ok, it is in.

Andrew




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]