Re: RFA: clean up logic in linux_child_wait

[Jim Blandy <jimb at zwingli dot cygnus dot com>]

Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> > GDB still uses linux-thread.c on the S/390.
> 
> It shouldn't.
> 
> >From the current sources I see:
> NATDEPFILES= infptrace.o solib.o inftarg.o fork-child.o corelow.o s390-nat.o linux-thread.o core-aout.o  core-regset.o
> # post 5.0 natdepfiles.
> NATDEPFILES+= thread-db.o lin-lwp.o proc-service.o 
> 
> i.e. it's actually using _both_.  What dies horribly if you kill
> linux-thread.o?  That module is pretty severely deprecated.


Well, the only thing that dies horribly is the three testsuite
failures I was trying to resolve.

Do you want my job?