This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [RFA] varobj.c/h interface change to varobj_update


Keith Seitz wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I would like to change the interface for the function varobj_update from
> 
> int varobj_update (struct varobj *var, struct varobj ***changelist);
> 
> to
> 
> int varobj_update (struct varobj **varp, struct varobj ***changelist);
> 
> This is because varobj_update calls value_of_root, which can delete
> varobjs from underneath the caller's nose. value_of_root already requires
> a pointer to struct varobj* for this reason. I am simply propagating this
> information up the food chain. Strictly not necessary (the function
> returns -2 if this happens and callers can re-query the object), but I
> feel this is much fool-proof and just plain makes more sense.
> (And I threw in small bugfix, too.)
> 
> If this is approved, I will commit changes to mi/mi-cmd-var.c, which will
> then be "obvious."
> 
> As always, I await your comments.
> Keith
> 

It is OK with me.  I know that you will take care of things if something
breaks ;-)

Thanks.

Fernando




> ChangeLog
> 2001-08-17  Keith Seitz  <keiths@redhat.com>
> 
>         * varobj.c (varobj_update): Change first parameter to
>         pointer to struct varobj*. This function can delete
>         varobjs, so we need to give callers the new varobj
>         when this happens.
>         (value_of_root): Update "var", too, if "var_handle"
>         changes.
>         * varobj.h (varobj_update): Likewise.
> 
> Patch
> Index: varobj.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/varobj.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.19
> diff -u -p -r1.19 varobj.c
> --- varobj.c    2001/05/10 16:57:01     1.19
> +++ varobj.c    2001/08/17 18:13:48
> @@ -866,10 +866,14 @@ varobj_list (struct varobj ***varlist)
>      -2 if the type changed
>      Otherwise it is the number of children + parent changed
> 
> -   Only root variables can be updated... */
> +   Only root variables can be updated...
> 
> +   NOTE: This function may delete the caller's varobj. If it
> +   returns -2, then it has done this and VARP will be modified
> +   to point to the new varobj. */
> +
>  int
> -varobj_update (struct varobj *var, struct varobj ***changelist)
> +varobj_update (struct varobj **varp, struct varobj ***changelist)
>  {
>    int changed = 0;
>    int type_changed;
> @@ -889,7 +893,7 @@ varobj_update (struct varobj *var, struc
>      return -1;
> 
>    /*  Only root variables can be updated... */
> -  if (var->root->rootvar != var)
> +  if ((*varp)->root->rootvar != *varp)
>      /* Not a root var */
>      return -1;
> 
> @@ -903,10 +907,10 @@ varobj_update (struct varobj *var, struc
>       value_of_root variable dispose of the varobj if the type
>       has changed. */
>    type_changed = 1;
> -  new = value_of_root (&var, &type_changed);
> +  new = value_of_root (varp, &type_changed);
>    if (new == NULL)
>      {
> -      var->error = 1;
> +      (*varp)->error = 1;
>        return -1;
>      }
> 
> @@ -917,34 +921,34 @@ varobj_update (struct varobj *var, struc
>       them note that it's changed. */
>    if (type_changed)
>      {
> -      vpush (&result, var);
> +      vpush (&result, *varp);
>        changed++;
>      }
>    /* If values are not equal, note that it's changed.
>       There a couple of exceptions here, though.
>       We don't want some types to be reported as "changed". */
> -  else if (type_changeable (var) && !my_value_equal (var->value, new, &error2))
> +  else if (type_changeable (*varp) && !my_value_equal ((*varp)->value, new, &error2))
>      {
> -      vpush (&result, var);
> +      vpush (&result, *varp);
>        changed++;
>        /* error2 replaces var->error since this new value
>           WILL replace the old one. */
> -      var->error = error2;
> +      (*varp)->error = error2;
>      }
> 
>    /* We must always keep around the new value for this root
>       variable expression, or we lose the updated children! */
> -  value_free (var->value);
> -  var->value = new;
> +  value_free ((*varp)->value);
> +  (*varp)->value = new;
> 
>    /* Initialize a stack */
>    vpush (&stack, NULL);
> 
>    /* Push the root's children */
> -  if (var->children != NULL)
> +  if ((*varp)->children != NULL)
>      {
>        struct varobj_child *c;
> -      for (c = var->children; c != NULL; c = c->next)
> +      for (c = (*varp)->children; c != NULL; c = c->next)
>         vpush (&stack, c->child);
>      }
> 
> @@ -1647,6 +1651,7 @@ value_of_root (struct varobj **var_handl
>             }
>           install_variable (tmp_var);
>           *var_handle = tmp_var;
> +         var = *var_handle;
>           *type_changed = 1;
>         }
>      }
> Index: varobj.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/varobj.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.3
> diff -u -p -r1.3 varobj.h
> --- varobj.h    2001/03/06 08:21:18     1.3
> +++ varobj.h    2001/08/17 18:13:48
> @@ -95,6 +95,6 @@ extern int varobj_set_value (struct varo
> 
>  extern int varobj_list (struct varobj ***rootlist);
> 
> -extern int varobj_update (struct varobj *var, struct varobj ***changelist);
> +extern int varobj_update (struct varobj **varp, struct varobj ***changelist);
> 
>  #endif /* VAROBJ_H */

-- 
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd.                     E-Mail:  fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario   M4P 2C9


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]