This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] Improve completion of locations
- To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: [RFA] Improve completion of locations
- From: Daniel Berlin <dan at cgsoftware dot com>
- Date: 10 Jun 2001 12:14:53 -0400
- Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at is dot elta dot co dot il>,gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <9743-Sat05May2001210007+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il><3B239593.24B7C578@redhat.com>
Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com> writes:
> Thanks Elena and Daniel for your reviews of Eli's patch. I really
> appreciate it.
>
> Eli, Your original patch with the fix you've added as per Daniel
> request, Elena's "++" suggestion and the adjusts to after JT's changes
> is approved.
>
> As I said, the evil is in the original definition of "linespecs" which
> leads to so many ambiguous cases. So, we will have to live with
> incremental fixes (and eventually unwanted side-effects).
Do you know where else besides list and break linespecs are used?
I have a parser/lexer ready to replace the decode_line_1 usage for
*breakpoints* (not list), but I want to make sure i catch all the
places i could use it.
>
> And thank you very much for all the completer improvements you've sent.
>
> Regards,
> Fernando
>
> P.S.: My apologies for the delay in responding. I have a considerably
> long queue of patches to review right now.
>
> --
> Fernando Nasser
> Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
> 2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
> Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
--
"I watched the Indy 500, and I was thinking that if they left
earlier they wouldn't have to go so fast.
"-Steven Wright