This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH RFA] New testsuite test: step-line.exp
- To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] New testsuite test: step-line.exp
- From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser at redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:32:37 -0500
- CC: gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, Edward Peschko <edwardp at excitehome dot net>
- Organization: Red Hat Canada
- References: <1010313071435.ZM15059@ocotillo.lan>
Kevin Buettner wrote:
>
> This test will cause 12 new FAILs when run against a current GDB.
> These 12 FAILs go away when my symtab.c patch is applied. See:
>
Kevin,
I was waiting for the approval of your symtab patch...
While we wait for that, I will conditionally approve this patch.
The conditions are the following:
1) You only check it in when you check your symtab patch in.
2) Make these simple additions to the ChangeLog entries (see below).
From:
> * gdb.base/Makefile.in (EXECUTABLES): Add step-line.
> * gdb.base/step-line.c: New file.
> * gdb.base/step-line.exp: New file.
> * gdb.base/step-line.inp: New file.
To:
* gdb.base/Makefile.in (EXECUTABLES): Add step-line.
* gdb.base/step-line.exp: New file. Test step/next in presence of
#line directives.
* gdb.base/step-line.c: New file. Test program for the above.
* gdb.base/step-line.inp: New file. We pretend that this file has
been transformed by some other tool into step-line.c.
Thanks for writing the test.
Regards,
Fernando
P.S.: In the comment inside step-line.exp there is a typo. It reads
"Test stepping in files in with #line directives.". There are thow 'in'
in the sentence.
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9