Re: [PATCH]: C++ mangling patch that is about to be committed

[Daniel Berlin <dberlin at redhat dot com>]

Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com> writes:

> On Oct 10,  2:01pm, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> 
> > I really resent the implication.
> > I split the patches and did modifications based on the existing set of
> > patches, which is why the patch has it.
> 
> My apologies then.  But I suggest you be more careful about what you
> send to the list in the future.  It is rather disconcerting to warn
> you about a problem (which you say you've fixed in your version of the
> sources) only to see it show up in later patches again (and again).
> 
> Kevin

Yes, I'll try. It's mainly because I have so many changes to those
files that it's easier to just modify the original patches by hand
than try to rediff.
I haven't rediffed this stuff since I originally sent it.
Which is why it keeps showing up.

I actually have to checkout the repository into a new directory just
to commit this set of patches, so i don't get the other changes.


--Dan