This is the mail archive of the gdb-cvs@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[binutils-gdb] Fix gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp


https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bde475616e3fdb6d41c047956aaf627fbf34a85d

commit bde475616e3fdb6d41c047956aaf627fbf34a85d
Author: Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu Apr 7 16:57:09 2016 +0100

    Fix gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp
    
    I see the fail on aarch64-linux,
    
    (gdb) reverse-next
    
    Breakpoint 2, callee () at /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/step-reverse.c:26^M
    26        myglob++; return 0;   /* ARRIVED IN CALLEE */
    (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp: reverse-next over call trips user breakpoint at function entry
    
    The test expects program stops at line 25, but program stops at line 26.
    
    (gdb) maintenance info line-table
    objfile: /scratch/yao/gdb/build-git/aarch64-linux-gnu/gdb/testsuite/outputs/gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr ((struct objfile *) 0x613000002880)
    compunit_symtab: ((struct compunit_symtab *) 0x621000121760)
    symtab: /home/yao/SourceCode/gnu/gdb/git/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/step-reverse.c ((struct symtab *) 0x6210001217e0)
    linetable: ((struct linetable *) 0x6210001520d0):
    INDEX    LINE ADDRESS
    0          25 0x0000000000400890
    1          26 0x0000000000400890
    2          27 0x00000000004008b0
    
    (gdb) disassemble callee
    Dump of assembler code for function callee:
       0x0000000000400890 <+0>:     adrp    x0, 0x410000
       0x0000000000400894 <+4>:     add     x0, x0, #0xcac
    
    the line-table show that the first instruction of function callee is
    mapped line 25 and 26.  I am not sure the line-table is correct, but
    it is not the point of this test.  The goal of this test is to test
    program hits the breakpoint on the first instruction of function after
    'reverse-next', so I change this test to expect the breakpoint number
    the program hits.
    
    gdb/testsuite:
    
    2016-04-07  Yao Qi  <yao.qi@linaro.org>
    
    	* gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp: Match the breakpoint
    	number instead of the comments on some line.

Diff:
---
 gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog                                 | 5 +++++
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp | 3 ++-
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 3d928b2..a044d5a 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2016-04-07  Yao Qi  <yao.qi@linaro.org>
+
+	* gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp: Match the breakpoint
+	number instead of the comments on some line.
+
 2016-04-06  Don Breazeal  <donb@codesourcery.com>
 
 	* gdb.dwarf2/dw2-opt-structptr.c: New test program.
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp
index 4a381a4..e06eb7e 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.reverse/next-reverse-bkpt-over-sr.exp
@@ -48,8 +48,9 @@ gdb_test "advance $lineno" ".*STEP INTO THIS CALL.*" "get past callee call"
 
 gdb_test "b \*callee" "" "set breakpoint at callee's entry"
 
+set bpnum [get_integer_valueof "\$bpnum" 0]
 gdb_test "reverse-next" \
-    "Breakpoint.*, callee.*ENTER CALLEE.*" \
+    "Breakpoint $bpnum, callee.*" \
     "reverse-next over call trips user breakpoint at function entry"
 
 gdb_test "up" \


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]