This is the mail archive of the
gdb-cvs@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
[binutils-gdb] Remove comments on software_single_step in gdbarch.sh
- From: Yao Qi <qiyao at sourceware dot org>
- To: gdb-cvs at sourceware dot org
- Date: 23 Mar 2016 11:22:11 -0000
- Subject: [binutils-gdb] Remove comments on software_single_step in gdbarch.sh
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=cc651c1cdd00dc821a0906dc648e89d71dcfc963
commit cc651c1cdd00dc821a0906dc648e89d71dcfc963
Author: Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
Date: Wed Mar 23 11:21:20 2016 +0000
Remove comments on software_single_step in gdbarch.sh
This comment is out of date. We've already done that. Patch is to remove
it.
gdb:
2016-03-23 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* gdbarch.sh (software_single_step): Remove comments.
* gdbarch.h: Regenerated.
Diff:
---
gdb/ChangeLog | 5 +++++
gdb/gdbarch.h | 4 ----
gdb/gdbarch.sh | 4 ----
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index cfb3716..a32d410 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2016-03-23 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
+
+ * gdbarch.sh (software_single_step): Remove comments.
+ * gdbarch.h: Regenerated.
+
2016-03-21 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* arm-tdep.c (arm_record_media): New.
diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.h b/gdb/gdbarch.h
index 2225c76..252fc4b 100644
--- a/gdb/gdbarch.h
+++ b/gdb/gdbarch.h
@@ -646,10 +646,6 @@ extern void set_gdbarch_addr_bits_remove (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, gdbarch_addr_
indicates if the target needs software single step. An ISA method to
implement it.
- FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: This should be replaced with something that inserts
- breakpoints using the breakpoint system instead of blatting memory directly
- (as with rs6000).
-
FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: The logic is backwards. It should be asking if the
target can single step. If not, then implement single step using breakpoints.
diff --git a/gdb/gdbarch.sh b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
index 1d7377f..37f59b7 100755
--- a/gdb/gdbarch.sh
+++ b/gdb/gdbarch.sh
@@ -605,10 +605,6 @@ m:CORE_ADDR:addr_bits_remove:CORE_ADDR addr:addr::core_addr_identity::0
# indicates if the target needs software single step. An ISA method to
# implement it.
#
-# FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: This should be replaced with something that inserts
-# breakpoints using the breakpoint system instead of blatting memory directly
-# (as with rs6000).
-#
# FIXME/cagney/2001-01-18: The logic is backwards. It should be asking if the
# target can single step. If not, then implement single step using breakpoints.
#