This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Support for additional AMD-type Flash Devices
Rene Nielsen wrote:
Can you confirm the -B and -T parts really have different
bufsiz and that these values are correct?
I tried looking it up myself in the datasheet
and the only mention of the buffer size claimed it was unsupported.
Thanks for your scepticism, Jonathan. Indeed, there's a flaw in the
previous patch. Never trust other people's work :-)
A lot of stuff we have to take on trust (not having hardware for
everything) but I just happened to notice. I guess it was a fairly benign
issue this way round making it fractionally slower (rather than claiming
it was bigger than it was which would have messed up the programming).
And if you can include a ChangeLog entry with your reply that makes
things easier too :-).
Sorry, I've never tried to post here before. Slowly learning... Included
in the attached and updated patch.
Looks fine, now committed, thanks!
*See us at Embedded World 2009, Nürnberg, Germany, 3-5 Mar, Stand 11-300*
eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com/ The eCos experts
Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571
Registered in England and Wales: Reg No 4422071.
------["Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere"]------ Opinions==mine