This is the mail archive of the
ecos-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- From: Sergei Gavrikov <sergei dot gavrikov at gmail dot com>
- To: Andrew Lunn <andrew at lunn dot ch>
- Cc: eCos patches list <ecos-patches at ecos dot sourceware dot org>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 21:50:08 +0200
- Subject: Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=gdKQUWn9XYIj2MGBSFGTIw2VEOYQhrpyLqvkTBxvFj8=; b=m0yfF69xLU91rj09zf+Ao7O0WuJ0ZXVuL6k3PodK8+Ui3stvSC1vK0Lr36nTmYcDDK Rj1Z0QDQCx+OFEKpwr6GTJE6ecaoWAYozLvN7whyN7OVp6O+TovQb00VtQ0v+iWE5/K9 oRIjVCiJhIeAMi12dhBHeUP1LDqFv8LYoX2Jk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=dzqJHK4ehRso7Ulx2oLhJDH1w7UcFe0fkkAdFC/hAfmKS1cwJpu0BSElS95d9B0daE Ew4gjR0+WRjqCARzwdP3U8DB9ZWUBOJ6AQhaEfuQ5TI83/IhzEgqLcT7v5niqQfMkgXk cBBCAbvf8yBORwslSQDZ00tMQgJj2dLWCbgrI=
- References: <20081103205406.GA9692@ubuntu.local> <20081107182918.GA13070@ubuntu.local> <20081120202139.GK17925@lunn.ch> <20081120204734.GA12716@ubuntu.local> <20081120215747.GL17925@lunn.ch> <20081121022731.GA29411@ubuntu.local>
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 04:27:31AM +0200, Sergei Gavrikov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:57:47PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > I will do. One question, Is it normal to have upcase(x) there? in
> > > dirname? What is a practic?
> >
> > Humm, lower case is more normal in directory names. However CDL
> > properties generally use upper case.
>
> Reworked: 3 flash packages became one: CYGPKG_DEVS_FLASH_ARM_OLPCX2294.
> dirname is lower cased dev/flash/arm/olpcx2294. Andrew, please, remove
> previous patches. I fix CFLAGS for arm-eabi and did refresh redboot's
> ecm files. There are redboot_RAM.ecm, redboot_ROM.ecm and minimalist
> redboot_ROM_minimal.ecm (no flash, eth, just serial) in the 'misc' dir.
> for the targets. I put all in one patch and new ecos.db.tail as well. Is
> it okay?
Andrew, excuse my incompetence, please. I reworked those flash packages
putting all together in one olpcx2294 flash package. I used legacy
28fxxx v1 branch there. BUT, it is a shame to me that I didn't know what
I could use stratav2 in the work. I need to get a timeout to try v2 API
there. I had no experience with v2 in past, but, I hope that will work
with 28FXXX parts. How do you see on that?
Sergei
- References:
- Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets
- Re: Support for Olimex LPC-H2294, LPC-E2294, LPC-L2294-1M targets