This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.org mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Problem with CYG_HAL_TABLES


I have used the CYG_HAL_TABLE mechanism before with success, but I am now running into an alignment problem with a new application. This is on an ARM architecture.

I have an object defined as:

typedef struct
{
 ....
} CYG_HAL_TABLE_TYPE MY_TYPE;

I then declare the HAL table array as:

CYG_HAL_TABLE_BEGIN( _MY_LABEL_, _my_name_ );
CYG_HAL_TABLE_END( _MY_LABEL_END_, _my_name_ );

I then place two instances of the object into the HAL table array:

MY_TYPE  my_instance1 CYG_HAL_TABLE_QUALIFIED_ENTRY(_my_name_, 2) =
{
    ....
};

MY_TYPE  my_instance2 CYG_HAL_TABLE_QUALIFIED_ENTRY(_my_name_, 3) =
{
    ....
};

I then iterate the table using:

MY_TYPE *p;

    for (p=&(_MY_LABEL_[0]); p!=&(_MY_LABEL_END_); p++)
    {
    }

This fails due to alignment issues:

The _MY_LABEL_ is not at the same address as the first element in the array (my_instance1) due to alignment issues. The iteration then fails. _MY_LABEL_ is aligned on a 4 byte boundary and the array elements are aligned on 16 byte boundaries. Is there any way to make this work?

Jay


-- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]