This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Switching to using git on eCosForge
Alex Schuilenburg <alexs@ecoscentric.com> writes:
> Ãyvind Harboe wrote on 2009-09-17 11:52:
>> Does anyone know a reason not to switch to git for eCosForge?
>>
>> My thinking is to use http://repo.or.cz/ to host projects.
>>
>> www.ecosforge.net uses a version of subversion that is getting
>> a bit long in the tooth (1.4) and I'm just wondering if
>> git isn't a better choice anyway....
>>
>> The plan is to leave the current subversion repository as-is and
>> let migration happen eventually, deleting old repositories(they
>> are still there in the history) after migration to git.
>>
>> The idea is to have one git repository per eCos repository(or
>> project if you will).
>>
>> The first project I would like to switch to git, is nios2ecos.
>
> Why git in particular?
Because it's simply the best? ;-)
> We have started looking at switching to another RCS at eCosCentric as
> well. In particular I looked at three distributed RCS solutions: git,
> bazaar and mercurial. While there is no doubt that git is the most
> powerful of the three solutions and also fastest on linux, it is also
> the most complex of the three solutions with a very steep initial
> learning curve, it's support for windows is lacking, and its
> documentation is sparse and confusing. As a tool for experienced Linux
> developers, sure, git is the best choice. But for the average eCos
> developer, I am not convinced.
Did you see this:
<http://code.google.com/p/msysgit/>
(I'm not Windows user, so didn't use it myself).
BTW, git has gitcvsserver:
<http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-cvsserver.html>
so those who are used to CVS and don't wish to learn new tool can
continue to use their favorite CVS clients.
-- Sergei.
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss