This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sourceware.org
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: [Bug 1000819] New: Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263
- From: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov at mail dot ru>
- To: ecos-discuss at sourceware dot org, ecos-patches at ecos dot sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2009 22:00:53 +0400
- Subject: [ECOS] Re: [Bug 1000819] New: Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263
- References: <bug-1000819-104@http.bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/>
On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 06:42:24PM +0100, bugzilla-daemon@ecoscentric.com wrote:
> http://bugs.ecos.sourceware.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1000819
>
> Summary: Add support for Atmel AT91SAM9263
> Product: eCos
> Version: CVS
> Platform: Other (please specify)
> OS/Version: Other
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Severity: normal
> Priority: normal
> Component: Patches and contributions
> AssignedTo: jifl@ecoscentric.com
> ReportedBy: dushistov@mail.ru
> QAContact: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org
> CC: ecos-patches@ecos.sourceware.org
> Class: ---
>
>
> Here is patchset that introduces support for at91sam9263 cpu,
> it splited to logic steps:
>
> 1)introduce arm7 package
> 2)fix hal_diag to handle 115200 baudrate
> 3)separate board's pio layout
> 4)move common for arm9 code for work with mmu into common header
> 5)hal packages for at91sam9263ek and at91sam9
> 6)implement support pio interrupts in the way as ordinal interrupt
> 7)support of norflash for at91sam9263
> 8)can support for at91sam9263ek
>
Finally I got reply from fsf:
>Your ECOS assignment/disclaimer process with the FSF is currently
>complete
so I ready to start discuss technical problems for merging support
for at91sam9263 into CVS.
--
/Evgeniy
--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss