This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: ROMRAM stand-alone application


> > We have two options. Fix the bitrot so that ROMRAM RedBoot works
> > again, or change the ROMRAM so that it works for standalone
> > applications.
> >
> > Nick says that ROMRAM redboot makes little sense, so i would suggest
> > the second option. Is everybody happy with that?
> 
> Sure - it at least sounds like it's not a step backwards.
> 

I believe that the following should do what we've talked about, i.e. enable ROMRAM applications to work, and accept that Redboot in ROMRAM mode will not work properly.  Do people think that this is suitable?

Index: ChangeLog
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/at91/eb55/current/ChangeLog,v
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -r1.5 ChangeLog
0a1,4
> 2004-04-08  Alan Bowman <abowman@synaptics-uk.com>
> 	* include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_at91_eb55_romram.ldi: Alter rom_vectors
> 	section to match the startup code for ROMRAM applications
> 
Index: include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_at91_eb55_romram.ldi
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/ecos/ecos/packages/hal/arm/at91/eb55/current/include/pkgconf/mlt_arm_at91_eb55_romram.ldi,v
retrieving revision 1.1
diff -r1.1 mlt_arm_at91_eb55_romram.ldi
17c17
<     SECTION_rom_vectors (ram, 0x02008000, LMA_EQ_VMA)
---
>     SECTION_rom_vectors (ram, 0x02000000, LMA_EQ_VMA)

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]