This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Re debug Problem


On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 08:38, Westwood, Geoff wrote:
> Hi Gary
> 
> 
> >What Viper 855T? - the Viper from Analogue & Micro is an 860T
> >(not that it makes much difference at this point)
> 
> No, my Viper is definitely a PowerPC 855T. I don't think there is much
> difference between that and an 860T but I can't remember the specifics off
> the top of my head.
> 
> 
> Here is the gdb output I get if I switch remote debug on. The last rx packet
> looks a bit dubious ?

No - PowerPC register packets look like this since there are a boatload
of them.
  <snip>

> 
> >What happens if you try to connect via the serial port?
> >Have you tried turning on GDB debugging (set remotedebug 1)?  This will
> >show something of what's going on.
> 
> 
> If I try to use Serial instead of Ethernet to download I get the same error
> message and a similar debug dump as shown above. The hex content of the last
> large packet differs slightly though.
> 

So how does this output differ when you build the simple version that
lets you connect?  I compared this output here with one of my Vipers
and it's pretty much identical - certainly in format - so I'm confused.

============================== mine ===================================================================
Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $qC#b4...Ack
Packet received: E02
Sending packet: $qOffsets#4b...Ack
Packet received: 
Sending packet: $?#3f...Ack
Packet received: S05
Sending packet: $Hg0#df...Ack
Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $g#67...Ack
Packet received: 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
Sending packet: $m30000,8#c4...Ack
Packet received: 0000000000000000

============================= yours ===================================================================
Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $qC#b4...Ack
Packet received: E02
Sending packet: $qOffsets#4b...Ack
Packet received:
Sending packet: $?#3f...Ack
Packet received: S05
Sending packet: $Hg0#df...Ack
Packet received: OK
Sending packet: $g#67...Ack
Packet received: 0002d654000276ec00000001000000010002765cffffffff000000000000000000000004000200000000000100003200020000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000020fffffffd00020000000000000000320000030000000000030000000000003200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000e5fc00023032400000290001106c0001b7f86000002000000000
> 
> 
> > Using net instead of "new_net"
> >From the snapshot you are using, both network stacks built fine.  What
> >problem did you encounter?
> 
> I am sorry I can't remember the build error now, it would take me a while to
> rebuild this. I can do it if you think it would be useful to resolve the gdb
> problem ?

This would have no affect on the GDB issue.

-- 
.--------------------------------------------------------.
|       Mind: Embedded Linux and eCos Development        |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
| Gary Thomas              email:  gary dot thomas at mind dot be   |
| Mind ( http://mind.be )  tel:    +1 (970) 229-1963     |
| gpg: http://www.chez-thomas.org/gary/gpg_key.asc       |
'--------------------------------------------------------'


-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]