RE: [ECOS] RE: AT91 patches

["Koeller, T." <Thomas dot Koeller at baslerweb dot com>]

Hi Jonathan,

could you give an update on the current state of affairs
regarding the AT91/EB40 HAL split? I am about to start a new
project, and I definitly would like to get rid of my
patched source tree.

Thomas
----------------------------------------------- 
Thomas Koeller, Software Development 

Basler Vision Technologies 
An der Strusbek 60-62 
22926 Ahrensburg 
Germany 

Tel +49 (4102) 463-390 
Fax +49 (4102) 463-46390

mailto:Thomas dot Koeller at baslerweb dot com 
http://www.baslerweb.com 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan Larmour [mailto:jifl at eCosCentric dot com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:29 PM
> To: Daniel Leu
> Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
> Subject: Re: [ECOS] RE: AT91 patches
> 
> 
> Daniel Leu wrote:
> > Hi Jonathan,
> > 
> > First, I'm pleased to see some work on the AT91 port. THANKS!
> > 
> > I second Jani's statement. Couldn't we start with the AT91
> > rearchitecture. This is the basis of all the other AT91 based
> > platforms and I don't think that they need the Flash changes.
> 
> Yes, I think will move forward with just the AT91 and EB40 
> changes, and 
> drop the flash driver for now. Doing that much at least for 
> the moment 
> should be uncontentious.
> 
> Jifl
> -- 
> eCosCentric       http://www.eCosCentric.com/       
> <info at eCosCentric dot com>
> --[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
> --[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- 
> Opinions==mine
> 
> 
> -- 
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: 
http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss

-- 
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss