Re: [ECOS] HAL macros and RTC

[Jonathan Larmour <jifl at eCosCentric dot com>]

Fabrice Gautier wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gary Thomas [mailto:gary@mlbassoc.com]
> > Subject: Re: [ECOS] HAL macros and RTC
> >
> >
> > The platforms define CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_xxx and they are very
> > much platform specific.  CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_RTC is the one 
> > interrupt which must be defined by a platform for the heartbeat
> > clock/timer, thus the platform neutral name.
> >
> > Is this not how you expected it to work?
>
> Well, I was just suggesting to change the name of the macros, because i got
> confused.
> What make  CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_RTC more platform neutral than say
> CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_UART0 and the others ? 
Just think of it as an exported API of the HAL.

> When I started my port, I listed my interrupt vectors and called them
> CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_xxx, and one of them is for an hardware Clock so i just
> named it CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_RTC. And then everything compiled fine and
> redboot runs, i didnt realized that CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_RTC was more
> special than the other CYGNUM_HAL_INTERRUPT_xxx until i tried to do
> multitasking.  
Read the porting documentation then ;-).

Jifl
--
eCosCentric       http://www.eCosCentric.com/       <info@eCosCentric.com>
--[ "You can complain because roses have thorns, or you ]--
--[  can rejoice because thorns have roses." -Lincoln   ]-- Opinions==mine


--
Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss