This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: ecos == slow ??
- From: "wangwei" <wangw at start dot com dot cn>
- To: ecos-discuss <ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 16:54:35 +0800
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] ecos == slow ??
- References: <3CA0881E.2A26A517@acunia.com>
I have same opinion as you.
Last year , I had try the nanox based in ecos on a arm7500 board , at 56M hz frequency.
But I 'm very dessapointted for the result.It's too slow.
It's even slower than the Xfree86 for linux running in the same board.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stijn Symons" <stijn.symons@acunia.com>
To: "ecos-discuss" <ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 10:39 PM
Subject: [ECOS] ecos == slow ??
> Hi all,
>
> Is eCos slow or our are we missing something here? Were porting a Java
> Virtual Machine to eCos, but it's much slower than running it on
> embedded linux in it's original code. The VM starts in about 5 seconds
> on Linux where the ecos port only starts after about 5 minutes (no joke,
> we timed it).
>
> We ported it by mapping al the primitives that the VM uses (mutexes,
> threads, queue, the whole bunch) to ecos, so there aren't many layers in
> it.
>
> any comments? Our target is a Compaq IPAQ pocket pc.
>
> kind regards,
>
> Stijn and Tom
>
>
> --
> Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://sources.redhat.com/fom/ecos
> and search the list archive: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/ecos-discuss
>
>