This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
Re: Trouble running ecosconfig under Linux/alpha
- To: Jonathan Larmour <jlarmour at cygnus dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: [ECOS] Trouble running ecosconfig under Linux/alpha
- From: Stephen Williams <steve at icarus dot com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 18:37:56 -0800
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
> icarus.com % ecosconfig new sh7708
> ecos.db, package CYGPKG_NET: warning
> This package is not present in the component repository.
> There is no directory `/usr/local/src/ecos-cvs/ecos/packages/net/tcpip'.
> ecos.db, package CYGPKG_SNMPLIB: warning
> This package is not present in the component repository.
> There is no directory `/usr/local/src/ecos-cvs/ecos/packages/net/snmp/lib'.
> ecos.db, package CYGPKG_SNMPAGENT: warning
> This package is not present in the component repository.
> There is no directory `/usr/local/src/ecos-cvs/ecos/packages/net/snmp/agent'.
> Segmentation fault
jlarmour@cygnus.co.uk said:
> Host sources, not target sources!
Yes, it is the host program (ecosconfig) that is crashing. I haven't
even *got* to the target sources. I have checked out the anonymous cvs
version of eCos, which includes the host tools. I recompiled the host
tools and now I am trying to run them. I can list the packages with
"ecosconfig list", but anything else gets me a core.
This is frustrating because the web pages claim that all this stuff was
tested under RedHat 6.1, but I guess that doesn't include Linux/alpha.
Grrr! Even RedHat treats us alpha owners as second class citizens:-(
jlarmour@cygnus.co.uk said:
> Perhaps rebuilt gcc 2.95.2 from source then, rather than installing an
> RPM that would replace your default system gcc. If you build from
> source you can install it to somewhere private.
Oh, I should have thought of that, silly me. But what about libstdc++?
Will it work with the precompiled libstdc++ or am I going to need to ...
Oh nevermind, I should be able to figure that out for myself.
But as a point of reference, the web page does say:
"The Linux version has been tested under Red Hat Linux 6.1
(and later releases)..."
and I'm using the canonical compiler for RedHat 6.2.
--
Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve@icarus.com But I have promises to keep,
steve@picturel.com and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep."