This is the mail archive of the
ecos-discuss@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: Re: Ctrl-C interrupt problem.
- To: 'Mark Salter' <msalter at redhat dot com>
- Subject: RE: [ECOS] Re: Ctrl-C interrupt problem.
- From: Fabrice Gautier <Fabrice_Gautier at sdesigns dot com>
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 16:41:37 -0800
- Cc: ecos-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Hi,
Well in fact download speed seems to be fine, i just forgot to set
download-write-size to a good value (i.e.: 0)
But there is still one thing which is slower, that's the O packets. In a
loop with diag_printf's it's very slow, like 1s between each line is
printed.
Thanks
--
Fabrice Gautier
fabrice_gautier@sdesigns.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fabrice Gautier [mailto:Fabrice_Gautier@sdesigns.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 12:21 PM
> To: 'Mark Salter'
> Cc: ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
> Subject: RE: [ECOS] Re: Ctrl-C interrupt problem.
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Salter [mailto:msalter@redhat.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 17, 2000 6:22 AM
> > To: Fabrice_Gautier@sdesigns.com
> > Cc: ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com
> > Subject: Re: [ECOS] Re: Ctrl-C interrupt problem.
> >
> >
> > I'm not aware of such a gdb change, but I haven't been
> > watching gdb development
> > that closely. I cannot believe that my patch alone would slow
> > you down as the
> > flush is only done when stepping, continuing, or killing.
>
> Yes i don't believe it either, it's why I think of some
> modification in gdb.
>
> Or may be I badly applied your patch.
> I'll check this and keep you informed.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Fabrice Gautier
> fabrice_gautier@sdesigns.com
>