This is the mail archive of the ecos-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the eCos project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: removing .sdata and .sbss


Daeyoung Kim wrote:
> 
> I used option -msdata=none to compile both eCos library and example/twothread.c.
> 
> But, I got below Map file which says simple_threadA/B are
> allocated to .sbss section.
> 
>  *(.sbss)
>  .sbss          0x01045a44        0x8 twothreads.o
>                 0x01045a44                simple_threadB
>                 0x01045a48                simple_threadA
>  .sbss          0x01045a4c        0x4
> //e/eCosSeIma/install/lib/libtarget.a(libc_mainthread.o)
>                 0x01045a4c                __sncyg_libc_main_thread
>                 0x01045a50                __SBSS_END__=M(.)
>                 0x01045a50                __SBSS2_START__=M(.)
> 
> Did I miss anything?

Sorry for the huge delay in replying - this was buried in my e-mail and I
didn't spend time looking at this. Gary Thomas here just did, and it looks
like you have found an inconsistency in the way gcc handles its arguments.
As a workaround, can you try also using "-G 0" as well as (or possibly even
instead of) -msdata=none? I haven't tried it but it may fix your problem for
now.

Jifl
-- 
Cygnus Solutions, 35 Cambridge Place, Cambridge, UK.  Tel: +44 (1223) 728762
"I used to have an open mind but || Get yer free open source RTOS's here...
 my brains kept falling out."    || http://sourceware.cygnus.com/ecos
Help fight spam! http://spam.abuse.net/  These opinions are all my own fault

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]