This is the mail archive of the
ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the eCos project.
RE: Strataflash mapping problem
- From: Gary Thomas <gary at mlbassoc dot com>
- To: "Doyle, Patrick" <WPD at dtccom dot com>
- Cc: 'Jani Monoses' <jani at iv dot ro>,"'ecos-devel at sources dot redhat dot com'" <ecos-devel at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 07:33:55 -0700
- Subject: RE: Strataflash mapping problem
- Organization: MLB Associates
- References: <F18ED44D2778844592DFB732956B665171863A@DTCNT40S4>
On Tue, 2004-02-17 at 07:28, Doyle, Patrick wrote:
> And besides... I moved on to playing with FPGA's before anybody ever got
> back to me with questions, comments and snide remarks :-)
>
> Seriously, except for a small comment from Jani, I never heard back from
> anybody on this, and have been distracted by another project since then.
> It's on my list to get back to this, but we've been using the "jumbo" patch
> here ever since I posted it last October.
>
If you'll send what you're using now, I promise to at least give it a
look :-)
> --wpd
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jani Monoses [mailto:jani@iv.ro]
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 9:27 AM
> > To: ecos-devel@sources.redhat.com
> > Subject: Re: Strataflash mapping problem
> >
> >
> > >
> > > IIRC, the 28Fxxx driver is somewhat newer and has better device
> > > support. If changes are to be made, it would be best to put
> > them into
> > > this driver.
> >
> > Gary, you used to say that strata is newer and changes should
> > be made there instead of 28FXXX :) FWIW Patrick Doyle had a
> > jumbo-patch which made strata CFI aware and added device in
> > series support too, but was probably not reviewed because of
> > its size and the fact that it moved a lot of existing code
> > too making it hard to read.
> >
--
Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
MLB Associates