Re: [docbook] <productname class="???">

[Jirka Kosek <jirka at kosek dot cz>]

Tomas HAJEK wrote:

> is there any particular philosophic reason, why the enumerated values of 
> the "class" attribute of the "productname" element don't contain "none"? 
> I can imagine many products, which have not assigned a trademark, 
> copyright neither are registered marks.
> For these one cannot use the default TM sign (class="trade"), as it is 
> not legal, IMHO.

The aim of productname is to capture product names that act as 
trademarks in order to list them in the trademark disclaimer. In many 
cases you can use application element to mark software and also 
*hardware* products without saying anything about their copyright or 
trademark status.

If using application element is not option for you, then you can create 
new DocBook RFE at:

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=384107&group_id=21935&func=browse

Please provide example about intended usage and describe why other 
DocBook markup is not suitable in your particular cases. Based on this 
input DocBook TC might extend list of values permitted on class 
attribute or come with other solution.

				Jirka

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Jirka Kosek     e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz     http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
  Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
     Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz
       Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature