This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- To: docbook mailing list <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:36:49 -0500
- Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: any reason why a "procedure" is not a child of "para"?
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303121404120.20249-100000@dell>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring dot com> was heard to say:
| On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Jeff Biss wrote:
|
|> If I may inquire, what ever happened to your RFE? I assume it wasn't
|> implemented, any reason why?
|
| well, i submitted it this morning. i guess norm is slacking
| again. :-)
Sigh. For a couple of weeks now. The prospect of getting eleventy-zillion
XSL and XML Query documents through to last call looks like an even bigger
time sync than the TAG. Heh.
But I'm trying to get caught up on DocBook apps mail this week and I
plan to do some serious stylesheet hacking this weekend.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com> | A man is not necessarily
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | intelligent because he has plenty
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | of ideas, any more than he is a
| good general because he has plenty
| of soldiers.--Chamfort
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE+b9KhOyltUcwYWjsRAhnQAKCn9rijat2HqjfzrrhhqgFXMQYI3ACfVMge
BtKmNgi+QR7Sf9nl5lrQnwI=
=WvVz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----