This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: Re: New element for Step alternatives?
- From: "John R. Daily" <john at geekhavoc dot com>
- To: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 09:59:36 -0500
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Re: New element for Step alternatives?
- References: <200209132023.g8DKN6g11843@purol.East.Sun.COM><87ofa19f5b.fsf@nwalsh.com> <20021015122933.GA11751@sideshowbarker><87r8dpdsp1.fsf@nwalsh.com> <20021118144515.GA11830@sideshowbarker>
I haven't followed the discussion closely, but to throw out
another scenario where the current procedure semantics seem to
fall short (assuming I'm not overlooking something):
I recently turned a series of functional test cases into DocBook.
Each case was 1 or more actions, followed by 1 or more expected
responses, possibly followed by more actions and responses.
--
John R. Daily
<email><mailbox>john</mailbox><domain>geekhavoc.com</domain></email>