This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: SGML vs XML
- From: Camille Bégnis <camille at mandrakesoft dot com>
- To: Andrew Westcombe <asw at getsystems dot com>
- Cc: docbooklist <docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:45:02 +0200
- Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: SGML vs XML
- Organization: MandrakeSoft
- References: <4.3.2.7.2.20020730144610.016632d8@172.27.10.30><4.3.2.7.2.20020730134045.01647de0@172.27.10.30><Pine.LNX.4.44.0207040945110.9698-100000@suneidesis><3D46B233.D30821F9@kosek.cz> <4.3.2.7.2.20020730134045.01647de0@172.27.10.30><20020730144242.C29511@caldera.com><4.3.2.7.2.20020730144610.016632d8@172.27.10.30><5.0.2.1.0.20020731103944.025219b8@pop3.getsystems.com>
hi,
Andrew Westcombe wrote:
> At 03:07 PM 30/07/2002 -0700, Bob Stayton wrote:
>
> I'd dearly like to have conditional sections in DocBook XML. I was
> planning to migrate from SGML to XML shortly after DocBook 5.0 was
> finalised, but I now expect that I'll be sticking with SGML for quite a
> while yet.
You should actually condiser the condition attribute solution. I use it
succesfuly for quite complex documents and finally find it more elegant
than marked sections.
Camille.