This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: Use of <varargs> and <paramdef>
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- To: John dot Himpel at edwardjones dot com
- Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 08:23:25 -0400
- Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: Use of <varargs> and <paramdef>
- References: <H000e5060da22a4d.1025636939.nspdmail-2*@MHS>
/ John.Himpel@edwardjones.com was heard to say:
| Is my attempted markup logical or is the DTD more logical?
|
| What is the "proper" way?
This is discussed in the reference page for funcsynopsis[1]. If you file
an RFE, we might be able to fix the content model. (I can't recall, off the top
off my head, if that introduces ambiguity or not.)
Be seeing you,
norm
[1] http://docbook.org/tdg/en/html/funcsynopsis
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Why shouldn't things be largely
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | absurd, futile, and transitory?
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | They are so, and we are so, and
| they and we go very well
| together.--Santayana