This is the mail archive of the
docbook@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list for the DocBook project.
Re: please only post the context you need
- To: shelton at usq dot edu dot au
- Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: please only post the context you need
- From: Alex Lancaster <alexl at bigfoot dot com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 19:30:02 -0700
- Cc: docbook at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- References: <005901c04539$3df01310$cdc3568b@sci.usq.edu.au>
>>>>> "PS" == Phillip Shelton <shelton@usq.edu.au> writes:
PS> Apologies. Dear list, To all. I am sorry that I have loaded the
PS> list with un-needed traffic.
No worries.
PS> I am still new at deciding how much to send back to a post and if
PS> I should only send to the source or cc to the list. I do not want
PS> to be saying things that are wrong without giving the chance for
PS> those that know more to correct me. Neither do I want to be too
PS> terse.
My view is that (and it's only my view as a list member, since I'm not
a list moderator and have no formal association with Oasis or Norm
Walsh or anyone), assuming it's not *too* long, it should be fine to
send source to the list, but you only need to do that once, for
follow-up parts you can either quote the section, with changes, or if
it's really large post it to a website or ftp server with a URL.
`diff' and `patch' are also your friend for large files.
RFC 1855 was helpful for me for sorting out these issues (although I'm
probably never in 100% compliance, myself ;-) ):
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
Alex
--
Alex Lancaster * alexl@bigfoot.com * www.santafe.edu/~alex * +1 510 642-1233