This is the mail archive of the docbook-tools-discuss@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the docbook-tools project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3?

From: Tim Waugh <twaugh at redhat dot com>
To: Ismael Olea <ismael at olea dot org>
Cc: docbook-tools-discuss at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 12:59:49 +0100
Subject: Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3?
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0206302135540.1375-100000@ven.sslug> <20020630220155.S8943@redhat.com> <200207010950.02694.e.bischoff@noos.fr> <20020701091350.T8943@redhat.com> <1025647065.3801.62.camel@lisergia.olea.org>

On Wed, Jul 03, 2002 at 02:23:30AM +0200, Ismael Olea wrote:

> What kind of risk is it? :-??

Not as bad a using a stylesheet from an untrusted source, but similar
in kind.

Tim.
*/

Attachment: msg00091/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3?
  - From: Peter Toft
- Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3?
  - From: Tim Waugh
- Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3?
  - From: Éric Bischoff
- Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3?
  - From: Tim Waugh
- Re: Any luck with DocBook/SGML 3.1 with Red Hat 7.3?
  - From: Ismael Olea

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]