This is the mail archive of the docbook-tools-discuss@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the docbook-tools project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: --parser and --nochunks are available

To: Eric Bischoff <ebisch at cybercable dot tm dot fr>
Subject: Re: --parser and --nochunks are available
From: Mark Galassi <rosalia at lanl dot gov>
Date: 08 Mar 2000 20:12:22 -0700
Cc: Jochem Huhmann <joh at gmx dot net>, docbook-tools-discuss at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <00022612310000.03037@localhost.localdomain> <00022823241302.01946@localhost.localdomain> <38BC0BF9.1E8F29B8@cybercable.tm.fr> <00022920513400.00904@localhost.localdomain> <00022920513400.00904@localhost.localdomain> <20000229121744.J15571@conectiva.com.br> <m31z5vmsrv.fsf@nova.revier.com> <38BD2E8F.A3A3F14@cybercable.tm.fr>


    Eric> No, but db2man can become part of the docbook-utils ;-)

Definitely: this, together with all other such useful scripts (like
the texinfo ones) should be merged in.

For robustness of the distribution, though, we need to make sure that
there is a tight loop with the maintainers of these packages.

If they have a regular release process, we can latch in to it and use
it for packaging.  If they don't, we can invite them to maintain the
programs in our repository.

References:
- db* does it serve the purpose
  - From: madhu
- Re: (docbook-tools) Re: db* does it serve the purpose
  - From: madhu
- Re: --parser and --nochunks are available
  - From: madhu
- Re: --parser and --nochunks are available
  - From: Jorge Godoy
- Re: --parser and --nochunks are available
  - From: Jochem Huhmann
- Re: --parser and --nochunks are available
  - From: Eric Bischoff

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]