This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: [docbook-apps] Standard Word 2003 template for converting Wordml-> Docbook
- From: Dan Gilleland <dagilleland at shaw dot ca>
- To: Mark Hummel <mhummel at pcug dot org dot au>, docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 09:00:07 -0600
- Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Standard Word 2003 template for converting Wordml-> Docbook
- References: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0407211251230.3382-100000@supreme.pcug.org.au>
Yes, such a template exists. It is available through O'Reilly publishing.
Check out this link:
http://oreilly.com/oreilly/author/ch02.html#tools
It's a simplified version of DocBook, but it's quite usable, and can be
extended to full DocBook.
- Dan Gilleland
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Hummel" <mhummel@pcug.org.au>
To: <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 9:20 PM
Subject: [docbook-apps] Standard Word 2003 template for converting Wordml ->
Docbook
> The motivation for this question is that archiving and processing of word
> documents using xml has been increasing and quite often Docbook is a good
> choice. (For example journal articles authored in word).
>
> It has been my experience so far that writing stylesheets to transform a
> document from WordML to Docbook is fairly straightforward. However,
> each organisation has their own set of styles named for their particular
> operation. That means that a new stylesheet has to be written for every
> organisation and while the structure is similar there is nonetheless
> some duplication of effort.
>
> A standard word template where the styles have a determined correspondance
> to a docbook element (even if not 1:1) would have the consequence that
> only one stylesheet need be written, modulo customisation. It would also
> save those organisations time by not having to develop their own
> templates; only some data analysis would be required to ensure that their
> content can be preserved in docbook.
>
> So does such a template exist? if not, I intend to declare one as a
> starting point for such a standard. It is possible? Are there technical or
> other reasons that I am missing? Do people agree on it's usefulness?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to
docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org, or visit
http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/.
>
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.710 / Virus Database: 466 - Release Date: 6/23/2004
To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org, or visit http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/.