This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
RE: [docbook-apps] Using XIncludes to include infosets
- From: Peter Ring <pri at magnus dot dk>
- To: 'Elliotte Rusty Harold' <elharo at metalab dot unc dot edu>, 'Paul Grosso' <pgrosso at arbortext dot com>, docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 17:30:20 +0100
- Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Using XIncludes to include infosets
Thanks for the clarifications (and sorry for top-posting this way)
Yes, I hinted to the xpointer() scheme draft
http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-xpointer/
Is it possible to state something in general terms (suitable for docbook-aps
rather than xml-dev) about what goes on? Pointing at document fragments is a
fairly basic thing; are we -- eventually -- to expect conceptually coherent
framework?
kind regards
Peter Ring
-----Original Message-----
From: Elliotte Rusty Harold [mailto:elharo@metalab.unc.edu]
Sent: 2. februar 2004 12:52
To: Peter Ring
Cc: 'veillard@redhat.com'; docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Using XIncludes to include infosets
<snip />
XPointer depends on XPath 1.0, not XPath 2.0. It will not be upgraded
to support XPath 2.0. Therefore it will not have all the PSVI
problems you mention.
<snip />
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Grosso [mailto:pgrosso@arbortext.com]
Sent: 2. februar 2004 16:29
To: Peter Ring; 'veillard@redhat.com'; docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [docbook-apps] Using XIncludes to include infosets
<snip />
No, it doesn't, if by XPointer you mean the XPointer() scheme which
is "stuck" at Working Draft (and unlikely to become unstuck).
<snip />
To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org, or visit http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/.