This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
[docbook-apps] RE: [SPAM] - [docbook-apps] Re: Docbook inlineequation/graphic to html - Bayesian Filter detected spam
- From: "Dimitry V. Ketov" <Dimitry dot Ketov at avalon dot ru>
- To: "Vitaly Ostanin" <vyt at vzljot dot ru>,<docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 17:31:13 +0300
- Subject: [docbook-apps] RE: [SPAM] - [docbook-apps] Re: Docbook inlineequation/graphic to html - Bayesian Filter detected spam
> > element. Grepping through the stylesheets
>
> You can also use
> http://xsldbg.sourceforge.net/
> great tool for debugging XSL stylesheets.
Ok. I will pay attention on it.
> test="../inlineequation"> test,
> > instead<xsl:when test="parent::inlineequation">. Am I wrong?
>
> IMHO, XPath expressions "../inlineequation" and
> "parent::inlineequation" are identical:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath#path-abbrev
I suppose ".." is identical to "parent::node()" or (because each element
has only one parent) "parent::*" but "../element" is identical to
"parent::node()/element" or "parent::*/element" (this expresses parent
that contains element) but not to "parent::element" (parent that _is_
element).
Real tests (xsltproc) is proving that claim.
Am I still wrong?
Dimitry.
To unsubscribe from this list, send a post to docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org, or visit http://www.oasis-open.org/mlmanage/.