This is the mail archive of the docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Re: no wonder i'm confused about the node() function

From: Daniel Veillard <veillard at redhat dot com>
To: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
Cc: docbook apps list <docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 17:02:46 -0500
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: no wonder i'm confused about the node() function
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303021456140.5185-100000@dell><20030302210001.B26124@sco.com> <87d6kspcuf.fsf@nwalsh.com>
Reply-to: veillard at redhat dot com

On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 03:57:28PM -0500, Norman Walsh wrote:
> Since import precedence is the primary discriminator for template
> matching, I think the test above should match comment and processing
> instruction nodes.
> 
> So I think it's an xsltproc bug that they don't.

Which has been fixed in CVS the next day it got reported on GNOME bugzilla...

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard at redhat dot com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

References:
- no wonder i'm confused about the node() function
  - From: Robert P. J. Day
- Re: no wonder i'm confused about the node() function
  - From: Bob Stayton
- Re: no wonder i'm confused about the node() function
  - From: Norman Walsh

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]