This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: What's the most appropriate (and futureproof) way tostyle the FO?
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- To: Bob Stayton <bobs at caldera dot com>
- Cc: Tobias Reif <tobiasreif at pinkjuice dot com>, docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 13:07:56 -0500
- Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: What's the most appropriate (and futureproof) way tostyle the FO?
- References: <3E42DEB1.3010200@pinkjuice.com> <20030209013715.C16867@sco.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
/ Bob Stayton <bobs at caldera dot com> was heard to say:
|> Is the purpose of the titlepage mechanism to supersede and obsolete the
|> property set option params, or are both mechansims intended to be combined?
|
| Norm might want to answer this too, but
| I believe the mechanisms are meant to be combined, in
| a hierarchical manner. The titlepage.templates
| mechanism establishes the default values, and the
| propery attribute-sets provide the runtime flexibility.
Right.
| I can't say how 'futureproof" these various mechanisms are.
| It kind of seems like there are too many places
| to set properties, but I believe some of that is the result of
| stylesheet evolution, rather than by design.
| So perhaps these will be consolidated a bit in the future.
Yes, I think a little bit of conscious redesign is in order.
Be seeing you,
norm
- --
Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com> | Be indiscrete. Do it continuously.
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ |
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iD8DBQE+WQ38OyltUcwYWjsRAsvbAJ0WkLSmyF+FqQP12KoCCoUO4waWdwCdFZM4
KCVjGNyccC0jlMa6MDUdW6U=
=O+LI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----