This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: dsssl rtf script usage
- From: ed nixon <ed dot nixon at lynnparkplace dot org>
- To: David Cramer <dcramer at broadjump dot com>
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:00:31 -0500
- Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: dsssl rtf script usage
- References: <97B71B827DFB2B448A73EC00E5DA0EE63CA2E0@logos.inhouse.broadjump.com>
- Reply-to: ed dot nixon at LynnParkPlace dot org
Thanks David,
David Cramer wrote:
<snip/>
I'm not sure if this is the level at which you're asking the question, but if you're on a Linux distribution the docbook-utils package may already be installed (See "Convenience Tools" at http://www.docbook.org/wiki/moin.cgi/DocBookTools). Try 'man jw' (which is wrapped by db2rtf etc.) When processsing xml instead of sgml with DSSSL, you may need the information in this faq:
http://www.dpawson.co.uk/docbook/dsssl/dssslgeneral.html#d1579e43
I missed this the first time I went through Dave's FAQ and it was the
bit I couldn't remember from the last blue moon. However it didn't work
the first time round because I had a catalogue reference (as per the
OpenJade docs, sigh) that points to the DCL file. After I'd commented
that out to let the command line DCL work, the conversion process seemed
to fine. (Except for some rather strange textual artifacts in the
headings where I think roman numbers would go.)
Configuration! For me, it's always the inter-relationships and conflicts
of catalogue items that cause the problems. Of course, it's tough to
document because the configurations are very installation specific.
I have to admit that when I try to use DSSSL to go to rtf, the results never look quite as good as I think they could, but there are knowlegable people (not me, btw) on this list who can help you with specific problems. Still, at least there are page number references (and they're even hot :).
I have to agree with you there. And, as we noted in our off-list
exchange, the RTF output of most of these tools makes you look like an
amateur because of the relatively rudimentary support for named styles
in the output file. DSSSL seems superior to the XMLMind tool, though, by
quite a bit.
Thanks again Dave. ...edN