This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: Onechunk problem
- From: Dennis Grace <dgrace at us dot ibm dot com>
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- Cc: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org, Norman Walsh <ndw%mercury at pok dot ibm dot com>,Michael Smith <smith at xml-doc dot org>, veillard at redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 18:13:05 -0500
- Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Onechunk problem
Hi Norm,
Okay, so now, what exactly does this new version of onechunk do? It looks
like it just passes everything off to chunk.xsl. What is the onechunk param
supposed to do?
When I ran version 1.6 of onechunk.xsl against my test files, I got exactly
what I'd expect from running the files against chunk.xsl: chunked HTML. I
guess, from your comment in the new version of onechunk.xsl, that's what I
should expect.
Another thing that confuses me: I wasn't having this problem with 1.49. I
had, admittedly, made a slight modification to the 1.49 onechunk.xsl file
sheet. I had changed the include from chunk-common.xsl to chunk.xsl. I
notice that in the transition from 1.49 to 1.50.0, you changed the includes
and imports from
<xsl:import href="autoidx.xsl"/>
<xsl:include href="chunk.xsl"/>
<xsl:include href="chunker.xsl"/>
to
<xsl:import href="chunk.xsl"/>
So, being a stubborn old ex-Navy tech, I fell back on old troubleshooting
methods. I swapped back to the earlier version (1.5) of onechunk.xsl and
replaced the import with the includes and imports as they were in version
1.1 (with the exception, as shown above, of including chunk.xsl vice
chunk-common.xsl). That worked.
Any idea why that worked? Why were the include and import statements
changed?
Thanks.
Dennis Grace
Information Developer
IBM Linux Technology Center
(512) 838-3937 T/L 678-3937 cell: (512)-296-7830
dgrace@us.ibm.com
Oh god comma I abhor self-consciousness.
|---------+---------------------------->
| | Norman Walsh |
| | <ndw@nwalsh.com> |
| | Sent by: Norman |
| | Walsh |
| | <ndw@mercury> |
| | |
| | |
| | 05/15/02 04:09 PM|
| | |
|---------+---------------------------->
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| |
| To: Dennis Grace/Austin/IBM@IBMUS |
| cc: veillard@redhat.com, docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org, Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org> |
| Subject: Re: Onechunk problem |
| |
| |
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
/ Dennis Grace <dgrace@us.ibm.com> was heard to say:
| Okay, all of this information about the refname is fascinating, but I'm
| still confused by the problem with onechunk.xsl.
It was botched. Fixed now in CVS. Er, I think :-)
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The years teach us much which the
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | days never knew.--Emerson
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee |