This is the mail archive of the
docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org
mailing list .
Re: Using fo-patch-for-fop.xsl and question about XHTMLnamespaces
- From: Norman Walsh <ndw at nwalsh dot com>
- To: docbook-apps at lists dot oasis-open dot org
- Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2002 08:16:23 -0500
- Subject: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: Using fo-patch-for-fop.xsl and question about XHTMLnamespaces
- References: <B861293E.2927%carlos@cvc.edu>
/ Carlos Araya <carlos@cvc.edu> was heard to say:
| I have two more questions after which I believe I can go back to writing.
|
| Is there a way to eliminate the xmlns: declarations from every single
| element on an XHTML file? They are hardcoded into each page and I don't know
What processor are you using? It isn't wrong to have them on every
element, but it also isn't necessary. Saxon, for example, only outputs
one at the top.
| if excluding the XHTML prefix would cause some problem I can't see (the
| problem of generating XHTML files was solved by switching to 1.48 version of
| the style sheets, which caused the next question)
The XHTML namespace name was one of the features that the previous
stylesheets couldn't provide.
| How on earth do I use the fo-patch-for-fop.xsl file? I've searched the
| sourceforge site and have found no information about the patch at all
Urk. Sorry. After you've produced x.fo using the regular stylesheets,
process it with fo-patch-for-fop.xsl to produce x.fop and pass that to
FOP. It's just another stylesheet.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | 'Heartless Cynics,' the young men
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | shout, / Blind to the world of
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | Fact without; / 'Silly Dreamers,'
| the old men grin / Deaf to the
| world of Purpose within.--W. H.
| Auden