This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See crosstool-NG for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Dear Khem Raj, On Thu, 5 Sep 2013 10:31:46 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > I am late in reply but here it is. No problem. Thanks for your reply. > > In fe9a576e8d27460468dfe5eac90aad49ab26a8d3 (gcc-cross-intermediate, > > gcc-crosssdk-intermediate: Remove) you completely remove the > > intermediate recipes, so I assume they are really no longer needed, > > even by the uClibc build, since I believe OE-core also supports uClibc > > builds (thanks to your work). > > thats correct. See the code around where limits.h is installed by gcc initial > uclibc was less of an issue, glibc was more until last year when a lot of cleanup > was done especially where build time dependency on libgcc_s and libgcc_eh was averted > in cross gcc and buildroot you can do the same like i have done for OE I can help out In the mean time, I've experimented a bit and actually implemented it. The patch hasn't been merged yet in Buildroot, but it has been posted: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2013-September/077344.html. Don't hesitate to have a look and tell me what you think. Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |