This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sparc leon toolchain 4.6.0

From: Konrad Eisele <konrad at gaisler dot com>
To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
Cc: crossgcc at sourceware dot org, Ralf Corsepius <ralf dot corsepius at rtems dot org>, "Yann E. MORIN" <yann dot morin dot 1998 at anciens dot enib dot fr>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 10:34:45 +0100
Subject: Re: sparc leon toolchain 4.6.0
References: <4EDC86E4.6030202@gaisler.com> <4EDCD1C8.9020608@rtems.org> <201112051227.53498.vapier@gentoo.org>

Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 05 December 2011 09:14:32 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 12/05/2011 09:55 AM, Konrad Eisele wrote:
>>> Here is a seperated patch for gcc 4.6.0 + binutils 2.21.1 for SPARC-LEON.
>> 
>> These patches belong into upstream gcc and binutils.
>> 
>> Forking gcc/binutils as part of crossgcc isn't helpful.
> 
> what Ralf said -mike

I agree but I keep sending patches
that are not applied. The binutil patch for instance
where sent but ignored. The gcc patch will be ignored too.
It was ebotcazou@adacore.com that decided that sparc-leon[3]
should be the target-vendor standard. I sent the [sf|hf]leon[v8]
variant but it was removed. He has the commit right, so he
decides, I cannot do anything about it. For the time beeing
it might as well be present in crosstools.
-- Konrad


--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq

References:
- sparc leon toolchain 4.6.0
  - From: Konrad Eisele
- Re: sparc leon toolchain 4.6.0
  - From: Ralf Corsepius
- Re: sparc leon toolchain 4.6.0
  - From: Mike Frysinger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]