This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi, On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Bryan Hundven <bryanhundven@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Arnaud Lacombe <lacombar@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I had the same in my tree! You may want to have a look, in particular >> for the download section, which require some other change in the >> downloader utility cruft. >> >> ?- Arnaud > > Interesting. Thanks Arnaud! > > Not saying that I don't like your patch, it is just a different way of > doing things. > The way that I had incorporated snapshots has no changes to gcc.sh. > The thing that your patch is missing (maybe it is in a separate patch) > is the "real gcc version" (I called it CT_CC_REAL_VERSION), which is > needed during the finalize step in scripts/build/internals.sh. > > Even better then snapshot support, would be the ability to > checkout/export gcc from svn from a specific branch/revision, much > like eglibc. this can be trivially done with git. I still have patches, but I'm no longer using ct-ng, so I don't really care about them now. This is a reason why I do not want people to only contribute patches to ct-ng. > Binutils is a bit more different. They make a versioned snapshot > (binutils-2.21.51.tar.bz2), a daily snapshot (binutils.tar.gz), and a > weekly snapshot (binutils.weekly.tar.bz2). > But they all currently extract to 'binutils-2.21.51'. Because the name > of the archive is different then where the archive is extracted, it is > tempting for me to modify CT_Extract() to support these kind of > snapshot archives by basically running: > binutils has a git tree too. > So that all binutils snapshots live in ${CT_SRC_DIR}/binutils-snapshots > > It's good to know that we have some things in common ;) > well, that was fun hacking around it, but ct-ng has too many limitation and architectural defect which cannot be easily worked-around. Maybe I should put my git repo online a day or another. - Arnaud -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |