This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 07:21:49PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > On Thursday 29 July 2010 17:19:16 Johannes Stezenbach wrote: > > Remove . from $PATH > [--SNIP--] > > + for p in $PATH; do > > + tmp=`(cd /tmp; cd $p 2>/dev/null || :; pwd -P)` > > No need to enclose it in a sub-shell. Also, the rest of the code > does not use `blah`, but uses $(blah). > > The ':' is absolutely valid, but a bit non-trivial. I prefer to be > really explicit and call 'true'. > > So I'm changing that line to: > tmp="$( cd /tmp; cd "${p}" 2>/dev/null || true; pwd -P )" > > > + if [ "$tmp" != "/tmp" ]; then > > Using /tmp as a default if the path is not found is a bit hacky! :-P > And replacing '.' with $(pwd) is no-less hacky! That's a clever way > to test everything in a single go! :-) Yeah, I have to admit it's a bit over-engineered, but my goal was to catch paths like "./" or "bin" (intead of "~/bin") etc. Of course one could argue that people who have gunk in their PATH shoot themselves in the foot and deserve it, however they might then send a useless bug report. Thanks, Johannes -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |