This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Am 18.05.2010 um 22:34 schrieb Arnaud Lacombe:x > Hi, > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 8:27 AM, Titus von Boxberg <titus@v9g.de> wrote: >> # HG changeset patch >> + fi > rather than introducing (incomplete) special cases, it might be better > to remove the GNU readlink dependency once for all. There is 3 Hi, removing GNU readlink is at least my intention. There is no necessity to replace it with a handcrafted script because there are no incompatible calls left. My intention also was to not restructure (and possibly break) anything else. Therefore the (sufficient and complete) if clause. As far as I understood Yann, the wish is to completely remove the wrapper. Thus, I see this case as irrelevant because it will get removed, anyway. If the wrapper remains necessary as an intermediate solution, I'd rather remove the wrapper script completely and always rely on the binary wrapper on all platforms. Then the if stmt would be obsolete. Regards Titus -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |