This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hello. >> In fact, I used them to create some kind of binary packages (by diffing >> each steps): >> linux-headers, libc... some i came manage to import them in a the target >> with a package manager. >> > That's absolutely not the purpose of those tarballs. What you really want > to package is the resulting toolchain. The bckup tarballs are only for > debug purposes. > > It wasn't to make a package to distribute but to make faked packages for the target system: basically, sys-kernel/linux-headers and sys-libs/glibc (gentoo embedded). The entire toolchain shouldn't be installed on the target (and will not run). And, yeah, I should have rebuilt libc but importing faked package from the toolchain was easier and less time consuming. >>> Not needed. -3 is the default for gzip compression. >>> >> Well, from man gzip and: >> > [--SNIP--] > >> it seems to be -6 now. >> > Yes, you are absolutely right! My mistake. A tiring, loong day, and I write > non-sense. It always was -6. Sorry. > > Wanna come with a patch to this effect, please? > > For correcting what ? changing -3 to -6 in the documentation ? or using -3 everywhere ? which is what my previous patch did (with the add of the --no-name option to which is pretty harmful, IMHO). > Regards, > Yann E. MORIN. > > Bruno. -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |