Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1 of 3] arch: s390 and 390x glibc patch]

[Harold Grovesteen <h dot grovsteen at tx dot rr dot com>]

Mike Frysinger wrote:

> On Saturday 14 November 2009 10:56:19 Yann E. MORIN wrote:
>  
>
> > On Saturday 14 November 2009 16:23:18 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >    
> >
> > > On Wednesday 11 November 2009 18:37:44 Harold Grovesteen wrote:
> > >      
> > >
> > > > Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > >        
> > > >
> > > > > under Gentoo, a bunch of cache vars
> > > > > are forced just for the headers step as there is no compiler to test.
> > > > > those include mlong double tests.
> > > > > 	libc_cv_mlong_double_128=yes
> > > > > 	libc_cv_mlong_double_128ibm=yes
> > > > >          
> > > > How do I achieve the equivalent of this with crosstool-ng?
> > > >        
> > > no idea.  yann might know.  just export those vars into the environment. 
> > > this should be safe to do for all targets during the headers configure
> > > step only.
> > >      
> > There is CT_LIBC_GLIBC_CONFIGPARMS that can be set in the menuconfig.
> > The value set in this variable is used to create a file named 'configparms'
> > in the top-level of the build dir. That file is then included from the
> > Makeconfig makefile.
> >
> > It is possible to use it to pass one value. Passing more is not yet
> > possible. I can work something to handle more. Care to try the attached
> > patch?
> >    
>
> these are settings that should always be there and the user shouldnt be forced 
> to configure themselves.  it also isnt specific to s390 ... it comes up with 
> ppc targets too.
>
> for the headers step, it's safe to export these all the time for all targets.  
> we've been doing this in gentoo for quite a long time now.
> -mike
I have not been able to reproduce this issue.  I even recloned the 
repository, rebuilt crosstool-ng and used my finalized .in's .sh's and 
samples.  Worked fine out of the shoot.  I am very close to posting a 
new patch.

Harold


--
For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq