This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
This might have been a hold over from the crosstool run that used this. I can again remove and see how it goes.Harold, All,
All-in-all, the same comments as for the previous patch still apply, plus the ones below.
On Wednesday 11 November 2009 18:40:30 Harold Grovesteen wrote:
+# Target options
+#
+CT_ARCH="s390x"
+CT_ARCH_64=y
+# CT_ARCH_SUPPORTS_BOTH_MMU is not set
+# CT_ARCH_SUPPORTS_BOTH_ENDIAN is not set
+# CT_ARCH_SUPPORT_ARCH is not set
+# CT_ARCH_SUPPORT_ABI is not set
+# CT_ARCH_SUPPORT_CPU is not set
+# CT_ARCH_SUPPORT_TUNE is not set
+CT_ARCH_SUPPORT_FPU=y
+CT_ARCH_DEFAULT_HAS_MMU=y
+CT_ARCH_DEFAULT_BE=y
+# CT_ARCH_DEFAULT_LE is not set
+CT_ARCH_FPU=""
+CT_ARCH_FLOAT_HW=y
+# CT_ARCH_FLOAT_SW is not set
+CT_TARGET_CFLAGS="-O"
Hmmm. I don't know. -O is overriden by glibc/eglibc to -O2, and I'm not sure gcc makes (a proper) use of CT_TARGET_CFLAGS.
Also applies to your previous patch.It is easy to remove the option. For what should I create a separate patch? a new patch for the sample?
+CT_BINUTILS_EXTRA_CONFIG="--enable-64-bit-bfd"
This should be done in the binutils build script, when the target is 64-bit. Prepare a separate patch.
Regards, Yann E. MORIN.
-- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |