This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sourceware.org mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi the 220-noteGNUstack-01.patch patch doesn't apply anymore against the gcc 4.3.2 sources. It fails with this : diff -durN gcc-4.3.1.orig/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S gcc-4.3.1/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S --- gcc-4.3.1.orig/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100 +++ gcc-4.3.1/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S 2008-06-10 14:58:21.000000000 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ + .text + .align 16 + .global GC_save_regs_in_stack + .proc GC_save_regs_in_stack +GC_save_regs_in_stack: + .bodyfoo.mpg + flushrs + ;; + mov r8=ar.bsp + br.ret.sptk.few rp + .endp GC_save_regs_in_stack + +#ifdef __linux__ + .section .note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits +#endif diff -durN gcc-4.3.1.orig/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.s gcc-4.3.1/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.s --- gcc-4.3.1.orig/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.s 2001-10-15 06:57:59.000000000 +0200 +++ gcc-4.3.1/boehm-gc/ia64_save_regs_in_stack.s 2008-06-10 14:58:21.000000000 +0200 @@ -1,12 +0,0 @@ - .text - .align 16 - .global GC_save_regs_in_stack - .proc GC_save_regs_in_stack -GC_save_regs_in_stack: - .body - flushrs - ;; - mov r8=ar.bsp - br.ret.sptk.few rp - .endp GC_save_regs_in_stack Isn't it a little bit strange to add stuffs in the ia64_save_regs_in_stack.S file, and then remove them right after ? Couldn't we just drop those 2 first hunks ? Thomas -- For unsubscribe information see http://sourceware.org/lists.html#faq
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |